403
16
(
A third thing which astonishes
us is the other apertion of Mr. Smith
I can only express my surprice that
he should have done so after His
Excellency's remarks at the Council
table condemnatory of
་་
question
Every
the article in
who has atterned the Legislative Council or read the Purat witter in the "China Mail or in the daily Sup" cannot help being convinced that bis Zvectioncip
remarks were condemnaton of some of Mt Sanités acts sus not the article in question, the only remark of disapprobation from dis Excellency regard to it being on the last paragraph
of
with
which
K
Auvies
thus:
of such posle had shown
anywhere,
in the vicinity of S. John's "Enthedral, the Registrar General and his Inspectors would long since have crescind " their very in mmary powers to recivedy
the nuisance
We have however heard since
that the writh of the article had receous
wak
and facts in hand to prove the — corectrep and bruth in that paragraph.
on
of every
In the Memorandum of two imit the letter he received from the Colonial Secutury on the 10th September 1875 we read concerning Wellington Street-
151
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.